PDF
FLIP
Cómo citar
Mejía Morales, L. M., Torres Arias, M., Marín Diaz, D. M., Rincón Hurtado, A. M., Gálvez Castaño, Y. A., & Rodríguez Amador, T. (2021). Relación entre los factores estáticos y dinámicos de la región cervical y escapular en el dolor de cuello en auxiliares administrativas de Areandina-Pereira 2020. Cuaderno De Investigaciones: Semilleros Andina, (13), 168-174. https://doi.org/10.33132/26196301.1755
Formatos de citación
Resumen
La estática cervical es un referente para el estudio del dolor de cuello relacionado a posturas prolongadas por labor. Esta estática altera el funcionamiento de regiones musculares que atraviesan esta zona y brindan la estabilidad para permanecer en relación céntrica cráneo-cervical, sin representar un desorden musculoesquelético a futuro. La relación directa entre sujetos con padecimientos en la región cervical o cefaleas expresaron valores por debajo de la media, siendo más susceptible las mujeres por su desventaja de capacidad muscular. Pocas investigaciones han sugerido medir esta capacidad en personas trabajadoras de oficina para determinar evaluaciones y propuestas de intervención pertinentes. El objeto de esta investigación es establecer la relación entre los factores estáticos y dinámicos cervical-escapular en auxiliares administrativas de Areandina-Pereira..
Palabras clave:
Citas
1. Robertson MM, Ciriello VM, Garabet AM. Office ergonomics training and a sit-stand workstation: Effects on musculoskeletal and visual symptoms and performance of office workers. Appl Ergon 2013;44:73-85.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2012.05.001
2. Poochada W, Chaiklieng S. Ergonomic risk assessment among call center workers. Procedia Manuf 2015;3:4613-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.543
3. Jun D, Zoe M, Johnston V, O'Leary S. Physical risk factors for developing non-specific neck pain in office workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. vol. 90. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-017-1205-3
4. Subbarayalu A V, Ameer MA. Relationships among head posture , pain intensity , disability and deep cervical flexor muscle performance in subjects with postural neck pain. J Taibah Univ Med Sci 2017;12:541-7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2017.07.001
5. Shaghayegh B, Ahmadi A, Sarrafzadeh NMJ. Evaluation of forward head posture in sitting and standing positions 2015. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-4254-x.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4254-x
6. Freire A, Ribeiro M, Bergmann A, Lemos T. Reference Values for Human Posture Measurements Based on Computerized Photogrammetry?: A Systematic Review. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2014:18-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.12.001
7. Salahzadeh Z, Maroufi N, Ahmadi A, Behtash H, Razmjoo A. Assessment of forward head posture in females?: Observational and togrammetry methods 2014;27:131-9. https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-130426
8. Benfica P do A, Aguiar LT, Brito SAF de, Bernardino LHN, Teixeira-Salmela LF, Faria CDC de M. Reference values for muscle strength: a systematic review with a descriptive meta-analysis. Brazilian J Phys Ther 2018;22:355-69.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.02.006
9. Jun D, Zoe M, Johnston V, O'Leary S. Physical risk factors for developing non-specific neck pain in office workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. vol. 90. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-017-1205-3
10. Szeto GPY, Straker L, Raine S. A field comparison of neck and shoulder postures in symptomatic and asymptomatic office workers. Appl Ergon 2002;33:75-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(01)00043-6
11. Johnston V, Jull G, Darnell R, Jimmieson NL, Souvlis T. Alterations in cervical muscle activity in functional and stressful tasks in female office workers with neck pain. Eur J Appl Physiol 2008;103:253-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-008-0696-8
12. Kim D, Kim C, Son S. Effects of Craniovertebral Angle and Cervical Range of Motion 2018;9:309-13. https://doi.org/10.24171/j.phrp.2018.9.6.04
13. Krause DA, Hansen KA, Hastreiter MJ, Kuhn TN, Peichel ML, Hollman JH. A comparison of various cervical muscle strength testing methods using a Handheld Dynamometer. Sports Health 2019;11:59-63.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738118812767
14. Vannebo KT, Iversen VM, Fimland MS, Mork PJ. Test-retest reliability of a handheld dynamometer for measurement of isometric cervical muscle strength. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2018;31:557-65. https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-170829
15. Matos M, Arezes PM. Ergonomic evaluation of office workplaces with rapid office strain assessment (ROSA). Procedia Manuf 2015;3:4689-94.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.562
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2012.05.001
2. Poochada W, Chaiklieng S. Ergonomic risk assessment among call center workers. Procedia Manuf 2015;3:4613-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.543
3. Jun D, Zoe M, Johnston V, O'Leary S. Physical risk factors for developing non-specific neck pain in office workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. vol. 90. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-017-1205-3
4. Subbarayalu A V, Ameer MA. Relationships among head posture , pain intensity , disability and deep cervical flexor muscle performance in subjects with postural neck pain. J Taibah Univ Med Sci 2017;12:541-7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2017.07.001
5. Shaghayegh B, Ahmadi A, Sarrafzadeh NMJ. Evaluation of forward head posture in sitting and standing positions 2015. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-4254-x.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4254-x
6. Freire A, Ribeiro M, Bergmann A, Lemos T. Reference Values for Human Posture Measurements Based on Computerized Photogrammetry?: A Systematic Review. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2014:18-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.12.001
7. Salahzadeh Z, Maroufi N, Ahmadi A, Behtash H, Razmjoo A. Assessment of forward head posture in females?: Observational and togrammetry methods 2014;27:131-9. https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-130426
8. Benfica P do A, Aguiar LT, Brito SAF de, Bernardino LHN, Teixeira-Salmela LF, Faria CDC de M. Reference values for muscle strength: a systematic review with a descriptive meta-analysis. Brazilian J Phys Ther 2018;22:355-69.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.02.006
9. Jun D, Zoe M, Johnston V, O'Leary S. Physical risk factors for developing non-specific neck pain in office workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. vol. 90. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-017-1205-3
10. Szeto GPY, Straker L, Raine S. A field comparison of neck and shoulder postures in symptomatic and asymptomatic office workers. Appl Ergon 2002;33:75-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(01)00043-6
11. Johnston V, Jull G, Darnell R, Jimmieson NL, Souvlis T. Alterations in cervical muscle activity in functional and stressful tasks in female office workers with neck pain. Eur J Appl Physiol 2008;103:253-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-008-0696-8
12. Kim D, Kim C, Son S. Effects of Craniovertebral Angle and Cervical Range of Motion 2018;9:309-13. https://doi.org/10.24171/j.phrp.2018.9.6.04
13. Krause DA, Hansen KA, Hastreiter MJ, Kuhn TN, Peichel ML, Hollman JH. A comparison of various cervical muscle strength testing methods using a Handheld Dynamometer. Sports Health 2019;11:59-63.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738118812767
14. Vannebo KT, Iversen VM, Fimland MS, Mork PJ. Test-retest reliability of a handheld dynamometer for measurement of isometric cervical muscle strength. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2018;31:557-65. https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-170829
15. Matos M, Arezes PM. Ergonomic evaluation of office workplaces with rapid office strain assessment (ROSA). Procedia Manuf 2015;3:4689-94.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.562
